Roomba 692 vs 694 (Head to Head comparision)

I tested Roomba 692 and 694 on different floor types and with various types of debris before writing this review article. And guess what?

In short: Roomba 694 totally rocked it! It performed much better on carpets and hard floors and picked up more debris than the Roomba 692. This is a big deal, in my opinion, and something to definitely keep in mind when deciding between these two models.

But wait, there’s more! There are a bunch of other differences between the Roomba 692 and 694 that are worth exploring. Keep reading…

Roomba 692 VS 694: A detailed overview

(1) Roomba 692 VS 694: Difference in Design

Alright, let’s talk about the design!

The Roomba 692 features a sleek and modern aesthetic with an all-black body, a simple silver Roomba logo on the top, and rounded edges.

On the other hand, compared to the Roomba 692, the 694 comes with a more advanced design. It has built on the traditional Roomba look that we all adore, such as the 675, 690, and e5.

Here’s a table informing the Width, Height, and Weight of these two different models:

(2) Differences in Controls 

Both these models have physical buttons on their bodies, offering convenient control options for users.

The Roomba 692 is equipped with buttons for Auto Clean, Return to Charger, and Spot Clean, while the Roomba 694 is designed with simplicity in mind, featuring buttons to start a cleaning cycle, return to the charging station, and spot clean.

One common feature between these models is the dust bin release button. However, the Roomba 692 takes it one step further with its flexible bumper at the front, which acts as a shield to protect the body from obstacles.

However, both models offer similar control options for users, with the Roomba 694 offering a slightly simplified approach.

(3) Difference in cleaning power

Knowing the cleaning power is a must before buying any vacuum. I tested Roomba 692 and 694 on different floorings like hardwood, low pile, and high pile carpet using dry cereal, rice, kitty litter, and granulated sugar.

♦ Roomba 692

Roomba 692 performed well on all three-floor types (hardwoods, low pile carpet, and high pile carpet) and against different debris types (cereal, rice, kitty litter, and sugar).

(1) On hardwood floors, the Roomba 692 performed exceptionally well, capturing 100% cereal, 96% kitty litter, 99% rice, and 95% sugar, and cleaning all debris within 7 minutes or less.

(2) On low-pile carpets, the Roomba 692’s performance decreased slightly, with a cleaning rate of 92% for all debris types. However, cereal, kitty litter, and rice still performed well with 100%, 98%, and 100% capture rates respectively, while sugar struggled at 72%.

(3) On high-pile carpets, the Roomba 692’s performance increased, with a cleaning rate of 97% for all debris types. The cleaning performance of cereal, kitty litter, and rice remained strong at 99%, 99%, and 99% respectively, but sugar still struggled at 66%.

♦ Roomba 694

While testing Roomba 694 on the hardwood floor, it captured 100% of the debris, including those in tight spaces such as corners and edges.

On low-pile carpets, its performance drops slightly, with a capture rate of 96%. However, it makes up for it on high-pile carpets, increasing its performance to 98%.

While this performance variation on different floor types is noticeable, the Roomba 694 still delivers more satisfactory cleaning results than the Roomba 692 model.

(4) Roomba 692 VS 694: Difference in navigation

Roomba 692 uses the “bump and continue” approach, also known as V-SLAM. Unlike digital mapping models like the Roborock e35 or Roomba i3, it does not have a memory mapping feature or the ability to store maps.

Instead, it relies on bumping into obstacles to navigate its way around the space.

Remember, this basic navigation method can result in some aesthetic imperfections as the vacuum may accumulate scratches over time.

On the other hand, Roomba 694 also uses the “bump and continue” navigation method. It will navigate away from the base, gently bumping into obstacles and rerouting until the area is clean.

However, If you’re looking for straight, crisp lines in your carpet after vacuuming, the 692 and 694 models may not be the right choice. For a more precise clean, you should consider models like the Roomba i3, i7, or S9+

(5) Difference in Accessories & Parts

The Roomba 692 and 694 both come with a set of parts and accessories, but there are some differences to keep in mind.

The Roomba 692 includes:

• Charging station
• Battery (not shown)
• Spinning side brush (x2)
• Filter (x2)
• Dust bin

On the other hand, the 694 model comes with a basic set of accessories, including:

• Dock
• Power cable
• 1 extra filter
• Owner’s guide

Neither the Roomba 694 nor the Roomba 692 includes a virtual wall barrier. If you need a virtual wall barrier, you may consider the Roomba 690, 890, or 960, which all come with one.

(6) Final verdict

The Roomba 694 is generally considered the better option due to its improved cleaning performance, particularly on carpets, compared to the Roomba 692.

As seen on the cleaning test, Roomba 694 model delivers better performance on carpets and hard floors, with a higher capture rate of debris compared to the 692.

I would recommend the Roomba 694 as the best option based on cleaning power. However, The specific choice between the two will depend on your cleaning needs and preferences. View price here.

---

F.A.Q.s

Q: Does Roomba 694 come with better battery life than Roomba 692?

Yes, the Roomba 694 has a better battery life compared to the Roomba 692.

The Roomba 694 has an extended-life battery that lasts up to 75 minutes, while the Roomba 692 has a standard battery that lasts for about 60 minutes.

Q: Can both Roomba 692 and 694 be controlled through a smartphone app?

Yes, both the Roomba 692 and 694 can be controlled through a smartphone app.